StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama - Research Proposal Example

Cite this document
Summary
The State of Alabama is alleged to have passed electoral laws, which were deemed discriminatory. The District court had dismissed the claim by stating that the Civil Rights Act of 1957 did not offer grounds on which the suit could be brought. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama"

Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United s v Alabama, (1960) Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama, (1960) The 1960 case of the United States versus Alabama was a watershed case in American history. The case was brought by the United States against the State of Alabama. The case was intended to ask the Supreme Court to offer injunctive and declaratory relief according to the Civil Rights Act of 1957. The State of Alabama is alleged to have passed electoral laws, which were deemed discriminatory.

The District court had dismissed the claim by stating that the Civil Rights Act of 1957 did not offer grounds on which the suit could be brought. The case was brought before the Court of Appeal after the Civil Rights Act had been amended in order to allow such action to be brought. The Supreme Court in its ruling on the case depended upon the revised version of the 1957 Act and vacated the judgments of the lower courts. The action was brought against the State of Alabama, Board of Registrars of Alabama and as individual respondents (Buono, 2004).

Since the registrars had been sued in their capacity as registrars the lower court ruled that since they had ceased from their functions in their offices they could not be sued in their official capacities. The lower court held that even if they had still been registrars, the United States had no right to sue them since the board of registrars could not be sued in its capacity as a board of registrars. Similar cases like the American Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades Council and Reynolds v.

United States among others followed the principle that cases that are brought before a court of law should and must be decided by the prevailing law even if they had been decided at an earlier time or in lower courts with another version of the law. The plaintiff alleged that the case of United States v. Alabama ought to be decided upon the principles of the amended 1957 Act against discrimination. The Supreme Court ordered the case to be decided according to the wishes of the plaintiff according to the revised 1957 Act and ordered the District Court to hear the court.

The ruling of the court was made in view of certain amendments. According to the Section one of the Fifteenth amendment of the constitution, it is unlawful to deprive any citizen of the United States the rights to universal suffrage because of race color or prior servitude conditions by either denial or abridgment of the law. Section 42 of the US Constitution stipulates that all American citizens who have the required qualifications that would entitle them to suffrage in any of the elections whether national state or county, will reserve the right to exercise that right at all elections without the authorities giving due regard to racial makeup, color, or prior servitude circumstances.

This provision is not subject to any contrary constitution, legislation, practice, or regulation of any territory or state (Gurvitch, 2001). Section 42 also provides that the state through the office of the attorney general must institute civil proceedings against any person believed to be about to act in a manner that would deprive another person of this right. The attorney general ought to institute suits in order to have injunctions, restraint, or whatever action deemed necessary in order to uphold this right.

The section also puts it upon the United States to undertake to cover all the costs associated in bringing such as suit. The denial of the right of a private person of the right of universal suffrage is deemed an infraction against the people of the United States (Gurvitch, 2001). Section 601 of the constitution states the liability of the person involved in the deprivation of the rights of suffrage guaranteed to everyone by the constitution. The section also provides that any action that is undertaken in order to deprive any citizen of their voting rights under section a will be deemed to have been performed by the respective state which may be conjoined in the suit.

The officials that presided over the action will also be conjoined in the civil action in instances in which they are still in office. In instances in which the state official has resigned from the office, the state will be sued on behalf of the official who is assumed to have been acting on behalf of the state (Turkel, 2006). This ruling is important in that it gives priority to the rights of all people without due regard to race, and social status. It is also important in that it places a constitutional responsibility upon the state to uphold these rights.

References Buono, R. (2004). Social Problems, Law and Society. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Gurvitch, G, (2001). Power, Politics, and Crime. New York: Transaction Publishers. Turkel, G. (2006). Law and Society: Critical Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama Research Proposal”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1436691-us-supreme-court-united-states-vs-alabama
(Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States V Alabama Research Proposal)
https://studentshare.org/history/1436691-us-supreme-court-united-states-vs-alabama.
“Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States V Alabama Research Proposal”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1436691-us-supreme-court-united-states-vs-alabama.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama

The Supreme Court Case Beck v Alabama

In the paper “The supreme court case Beck v Alabama” the author discusses the Death Penalty Act of 1981.... This was in new agreement after the supreme court case Beck v.... alabama: “Struck a portion of alabama's death penalty law that blocked juries from convicting defendants of an included lesser offense.... hellip; The author states that after the passing of this law, starting in 1983, alabama has executed 34 people in the history of its death sentence program....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Media Law: Sullivan vs. New York Times Case

In order to answer this question one should recall the main features of Sullivan defense, and recall this case in order to understand the meaning of the Sullivan defense. … Sullivan vs.... supreme court found that newspaper really misrepresented some facts, yet it nevertheless held that public official who sued for the damages must prove first of all, that untrue information was intentionally presented as such or that no attempt was actually made to find out whether this information was false or untrue and thus gross neglect to the verification of the truth occurred....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Powell v. Alabama

Alabama was the first of the infamous Scottsboro cases decided by the supreme court.... supreme court Decision1.... alabama, 287 U.... In this case, nine black youths were arrested near Scottsboro, alabama, and charged with having raped two white women riding on a freight train in March 1931.... In one hundred and forty years, the legal governance of the states has never been interfered with, so why should it happen now The decision of the lower state court was reversed and remanded back to the lower court for further proceedings....
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Supreme Court of the United States

The case study "Supreme Court of the united states " states that What was the applicable law in regard to this matter, where the matter in dispute occurred in Pennsylvania, and the railroad company had been registered in New York.... According to them, the Liability borne by Tompkins should be determined according to Pennsylvanian law as allowed by Section 34 of the united states' Federal Judiciary Act.... Section 34 of the Federal Judiciary Act provided that; the several state's law shall only be applicable in a common law trial in making the decision, except where it is otherwise required or provided by the united states Constitution, treaties or statutes, united states courts or in applicable cases....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

Mediation Memorandum

This is intended to provide the mediation team with sufficient… I (Marshal Petersen) entered into a binding contract with the Muscadine grape supplier six months ago after meeting the defendant in a local church in Huntsville, alabama, where he was teaching.... The second contract involved in this case is the agreement that was signed by his son of the grape supplier on behalf of their family's produce company...
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Death Penalty in Illinois and USA

Illinois is one of the states in the US to adopt the death penalty and so far has hanged 12 prisoners since 1976.... By April 2008, 37 states, the federal government and the US military had authorized the death penalty.... Out of the 37 states which have adopted the death penalty many have questioned the credibility and efficacy of it over the years because in many cases the death penalty has rarely acted as a deterrent to would-be criminals....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Environmental Law Court: United States v Bestfoods

united states v.... united states v.... tml united states v.... nited states v.... The united states Supreme CourtIII.... united states federal government, specifically the Environmental Protection Agency (plaintiff) v.... The trial court held CPC liable, whether directly or indirectly, for the mess; the appellate court reversed, and the supreme court upheld that decision.... om/docs/302160/United-states- v-Bestfoods-Case-Brief Jrank....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

American Constitution Law: Mock Judicial Decision

united states.... These issues are crucial in handing over the decision by the supreme court.... nbsp; … This case clearly shows the importance of proper collection and analysis of evidence in a crime scene to ensure that there is the proper conviction of a case.... The author of the "American Constitution Law: Mock Judicial Decision" paper examines the case of an elderly man called Mr.... n making this decision, it is crucial to look at evidence that can be used in this case....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us