StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Human Resources Performance Appraisals - Research Paper Example

Summary
The following research 'Human Resources Performance Appraisals' represents a description of the appraisal systems and draws a comparison and contrast between them. The two appraisal systems to be compared and contrasted are the pay-for-performance method and the balanced scorecard (BSC) method…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Human Resources Performance Appraisals
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Human Resources Performance Appraisals"

 Human Resources Performance Appraisals: Human Resources Performance Appraisals: A Comparative Review Human resources management has identified crucial functions that pertain to the acquisition, maintenance and development of personnel. Performance appraisals and evaluation systems are integral parts of the maintenance function that encourages organizations to support, sustain, and assume a proactive stance in the assessment of performance of its human resources against a defined standard. In contemporary times, the paramount importance of performance appraisals and management systems remain to be the subject of scrutiny to determine best practices and identify techniques that are deemed most effective in the achievement performance goals. In this regard, the current discourse aims to present results of research on two different performance management and appraisal systems from real companies. To achieve this goal, the results of the studies on diverse personnel appraisals and evaluation systems by Mulvaney, McKinney, & Grodsky (2012) of the Elmburst Park District, a municipal agency; and that of Nili & Shekarchizadeh (2012) for production plants would be closely examined. A description of the appraisal systems and the strengths as well as weaknesses of each would be compared and contrasted. Performance Appraisal Systems For purposes of complying with the requirements of this paper, the two appraisal systems to be compared and contrasted are the pay-for-performance method and the balance score card (BSC) method. According to the Performance Management Help Center (2012), pay-for-performance or merit pay refers “to the process of determining employee compensation (base salary or bonuses), in part, on the basis of how well each employee performs at work” (Bacal & Associates, 2012, par. 1). This approach works by starting with the job description of employees and setting defined goals or objectives within a stipulated time frame. Other factors could be integrated in assessing employee performance such as conformity to organizational policies (meauring attendance records); through customer service feedback (more positive feedback the greater the points); ability to submit reports on time with minimal error; possessing initiative, dedication to their work, diligence and commitment, among others. Thus, the merit could be in the form of promotions, bonuses, or “direct compensation for quantified production (where) that's supposed to reward those that work faster” (Bacal & Associates, 2012, par. 3). On the other hand, balance score card method was specifically defined as a performance evaluation method that “evaluates the level of organizational performance from 4 points of view such as financial, customer, the internal processes of business and growth and learning” [Nil12]. The performance appraisal system using the BSC approach actually implements four components through delving into the following: the financial aspect (the way the organization successfully generates profits); customer satisfaction and ability to entice consumers to patronize the organizations’ products or services; facets of the organizations’ internal resources that are used in full potentials with limited costs; and taking a proactive stance in looking beyond current operations. Comparative Analysis The similarities in these methods come in terms of their overall goal or aim which is to assess the level of productivity and performance within the organization based on some factors or standards. Likewise, these appraisal methods share similarities in generating a quantifiable gauge which becomes the basis for promotions or the needed information to discern weaknesses and areas which need appropriate improvements; either through training and development or through replacement of low performing human resources. On the other hand, there are marked differences between these approaches in terms of perspectives. For the pay-for-performance, the focus in the employees’ ability to achieve defined goals based on responsibilities; for BSC, the focus is more holistic or a macro-oriented perspective by including four specific facets to enable the organization to gauge the overall level of performance, not only of the employee – but of the whole organization. As emphasized by Mulvaney, McKinney, & Grodsky (2012), “an agency's performance appraisal system impacts individual and organizational operations by prompting decisions regarding compensation and merit salary increases, training and development opportunities, performance improvement, promotion, termination, organizational climate, and financial management” (p. 506). Concurrently, the BSC was noted to “help organization to overcome their two important key issues: (1) organizational performance evaluation; (and) (2) implementation of strategy” [Nil12]. As can be deduced, organizational performance evaluation is the area of evaluation under BSC whereas employee performance evaluation is the focal point of the pay-for-performance method. The strengths of the pay-for-performance lie in its easy and simple framework and deemed to be the “one of tbe most effective methods of motivating and increasing employee performance” [Mul121]. Its drawbacks include its being subject to biases and unfair judgements of those making the appraisals (the raters) and the perceptions of fairness apparently influences the level of motivation and performance [Mul121]. As noted, there are some pay-for-performance methods that require employee participation in the process to enhance effectiveness. As emphasized, “the opportunities for employee voice in the appraisal process resulted in the employee displaying little resistance to his performance ratings. Furthermore, the supervisor's feedback identified very specific, job deficient areas for the employee to improve upon” (p. 527). Thus, the objectivity and professionalism exercised by raters play a very important role in this performance appraisal approach. For the BSC, the strengths include its ability to integrate other measures of performance to determine how different facets of the organization contribute to the achievement of the mission, vision and goals. Its weaknesses include complexity and the challenging way to implement BSC in an organizational setting. Its applicability would have to be determined based on the sector or industry the organization belongs and the manner by which data could be collected and evaluated on an objective manner. Conclusion The discourse has hereby compared the pay-for-performance approach used by the Elmburst Park District, as compared to the BSC approach applied in production plants. These two approaches were initially defined and the manner by which these methods operate were expounded. Similarities and disparities of both methods were also presented, prior to identification of strengths and weaknesses. Based on one’s personal experience while working in organizations, the pay-for-performance which was applied was most convenient to use and most effective as long as the raters or supervisors are considered competent and fair. There must be clarity in determining scores or points and it would have been a great help if the workers were made to understand how the performance appraisal was designed. As indicated, employees who participated in the development and design of the performance evaluation method would be least resistant to it and would conform to the ratings by which their performances are gauged. From the start, the involvement of employees in goal-setting automatically motivates them to attain these objectives and offers them a chance to set up controls on materials and technology to be used. The portion that allows employees to comment or send their feedback is also crucial so that any questioned rating could be resolved. From the presentation of both performance appraisal methods, it could be deduced that their success in implementation and applicability would really depend on the needs of the organization; as well as the complexity within which organizational functions and operations need to be assessed. Likewise, those implementing these appraisal systems must be competent and qualified, not only in terms of discerning the effectiveness of the design; but also of ensuring that the outcome to be generated from each method would be useful to the organization. References Nil12: , (Nili & Shekarchizadah, 2012, p. 74), Nil12: , (Nili & Shekarchizadah, 2012, p. 75), Mul121: , (Mulvaney, McKinney, & Grodsky, 2012, p. 507), Mul121: , (Mulvaney, McKinney, & Grodsky, 2012), https://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&hid=124&sid=044611c3-cb09-4478-9f29-0d2387a02540%40sessionmgr114 https://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&hid=1&sid=78a58f5e-43d9-46e9-b521-5685085ddec7%40sessionmgr112 Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Human Resources Performance Appraisals

Performance Appraisal as a Function of Human Resource Management

The focus of this paper "performance Appraisal as a Function of Human Resource Management" is on one of the important functions executed in an organization that formulates and implements policies regarding recruitment and functioning of the employees.... One of such tools is the performance appraisal system which elaborates on the evaluation of the individual employee performances and likewise suggests the determination of the reward system.... Based on this notion, it has often been argued that performance appraisal performs a vital function to determine the sustainability of an organization to a large extent (Rees & Porter, 2004)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

THE ROLE OF Human Resource Information System (HRIS) IN ACHIEVING EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Literature Review THE ROLE OF Human Resource Information System (HRIS) IN ACHIEVING EFFECTIVE performance APPRAISAL 2.... It is not for nothing therefore that much attention will be given to the area of performance appraisal in seeking ways of making it more and more effective.... This literature review is therefore focused on finding major existing literature that is related to the problem of making performance appraisal effective.... Human Resource Information System As the search for best ways to use information technology in human resource management continues, the argument is further reduced to best ways in using information technology in performance appraisal....
9 Pages (2250 words) Dissertation

Human resources management: performance appraisals

owever one issue of concern is the rater biasness in performance appraisals.... erformance appraisals help organizations clarify expectations that it may have from the employees and build trust.... Since the evaluators are humans, it is possible and generally does happen that their appraisals of certain employee may be biased either in his favor or against him.... A 360-degree performance appraisal takes into consideration the views of all the other individuals who enter any form of interaction with the members of the college i....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Managing Human Resources: Performance Appraisal

The Conference Board study showed differences between the stated objectives of appraisals and the way they were actually used.... In the Work Planning and Review approach to appraisal, It will be emphasised that frequent performance discussions need to be undertaken.... But performance discussions and salary actions will be dealt with at separate meetings. ... ppraisal will measure performance in achieving goals and plans and performance as a manager, that is, how well a person carries out key managerial activities....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Performance Appraisal Systems in Human Resource Management

In this context, human resources mean 'the traits that people bring to the workplace [organisation] – intelligence, aptitude, commitment, tacit knowledge and skills, and ability to learn' (Javed 2009: 3).... From the paper "performance Appraisal Systems in Human Resource Management" it is clear that performance appraisal should mutually be addressed both the employees and the organisations, as employees' development should be viewed intertwined with that of the organisation 's....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

Effective Functioning of the Performance Management System

In today's ever-dynamic and highly competitive business environment, most organizations are increasingly leveraging their human resources as a source of innovativeness and competitiveness.... In today's ever-dynamic and highly competitive business environment, most organizations are increasingly leveraging their human resources as a source of innovativeness and competitiveness.... In today's ever-dynamic and highly competitive business environment, most organizations are increasingly leveraging their human resources as a source of innovativeness and competitiveness....
23 Pages (5750 words) Coursework

Are Performance Appraisals Reliable Efficient Method to Document and Evaluate Job Performance

The paper 'Are performance appraisals Reliable Efficient Method to Document and Evaluate Job Performance?... The paper 'Are performance appraisals Reliable Efficient Method to Document and Evaluate Job Performance?... is an intriguing example of human resources research proposal.... It is essential to maintain the productivity and performance of the human resources in the working continuum at their peak.... is an intriguing example of human resources research proposal....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Proposal

Human Resource Management, Performance Appraisal

The paper "Human Resource Management, performance Appraisal" is a good example of a management essay.... The paper "Human Resource Management, performance Appraisal" is a good example of a management essay.... The paper "Human Resource Management, performance Appraisal" is a good example of a management essay.... In this regard, organizations need to come up with integrated approaches that promote employee performance.... In addition, employee performance evaluation and appraisal have taken the centre stage in human resource management....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us