StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Mod 3 Pre-trial and trial procedures - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
Criminal procedure is concerned with identified rules governing the steps to be followed through which the government enforces the set of rules that define prohibited conduct because it poses a threat or endangers citizens. The detailed criminal proceedings involve search,…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Mod 3 Pre-trial and trial procedures
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Mod 3 Pre-trial and trial procedures"

MEMORANDUM RE: QUESTION PRESENTED: PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES Criminal procedure is concerned with identified rules governing the steps to be followed through which the government enforces the set of rules that define prohibited conduct because it poses a threat or endangers citizens. The detailed criminal proceedings involve search, seizure, arrest and interrogations. Self-representation: Although the Supreme Court allows one to represent oneself, this must be after the trial court has undertaken thorough Faretta to determine if the accused has the level of intelligence and is competent to represent oneself.

Statement of FactsThe Right to Self-Representation: The case of the long Island Railroad massacre. In December 7 1993, Colin Ferguson from Jamaica started shooting passengers on a commuter train at random killing six and injuries 16 people; after he stopped to reload, the passengers restrained him. When appearing in court, he self-represented himself but the eyewitnesses and the prosecutor managed to convince the magistrate to sentence him to more than 200 jail terms in New York Attica Prison.

The critics of this case argue that he was not in his sane mind to stand trial hence the court was wrong to convict and sentence him (People v Ferguson248, N.Y App 1998).In the Poucell v Alabama, 287 U.S case, fourteen African youths were unfairly charged by the court for reportedly raping two white women, the case which was popularly known as the ‘Scottsboro case’ where within two weeks of arrest, they were convicted, tried and sentenced to death; the Supreme Court reversed this conviction.

In Indiana a defendant was found competent to self-represent but the trial court did not allow him to, even though he was competent. An attorney was appointed to represent him, but he was sentenced, following a Foreta, a similar case wherein it was held by the Supreme Court that the accused was competent to self-represent. The disposal of petty offenses; these cases guarantee that either a fine or a short jail term is imposed. Cases such as common traffic laws and breaking of local regulations fall into this category.

DiscussionThe Preliminary hearing is where the magistrate hears the state’s case and determines if it can appear before the grand jury or not. The functions of grand jury include: preventing baseless, discriminatory and overzealous charges by examining hearings and evidence presented before it. The grand jury also has power to order the witnesses to appear before it, issue immunity or hold the individuals in contempt. The jurisdiction and venue: before a court hears a case and rules, it acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter and state, then determines the place where the case will be heard. The U.S Constitution requires the venue to be in the state where the crime was caused unless the defendants decide otherwise.

Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the venue, for instance if the accused has fired across the border line of two districts killing someone, the court must resolve this jurisdiction considering the relevant statutes and precedents. Sometimes, the defendant stands accused of several cases arising from one set of facts, each offense may be judged separately but it’s more efficient to judge them jointly, a situation known as joinder and severance. Where two or more related offenses are charged in a single indictment or information the court may grant a severance of the charges to achieve a fair judgment.

Mode of pretrial release: it takes various forms; the first one is personal recognizance, where the accused accepts some restrictions, release to the custody of another where the court may release the defendant to the care of a responsible person, posting an individual bond where the defendant posts a bond agreeing to appear in court as required. The final form is posting a surety bond where a premium is paid by a third person who agrees to post a bond for the defendant (Scheb, 2011). More than 90% of felony suspects plead guilty or do not contest, through an agreement met by the defense and prosecutor that results in reduction of the harshness of the judgment, this is known as the plea bargaining.

The defendant has the right for the case to be solved through a public appointed counsel within the shortest time possible, this is the right to a speedy trial. The federal law requires the arrested defendant to be brought before the court without delay.ConclusionThe U.S. Constitution gives every suspected person the right to be treated as not guilty until the magistrate rules otherwise as per the amount of evidence provided before him or her, with equal chance given to both the prosecutor and the defendant, with the hearing passing through various stages, forms and the courts having their designed functions.

Work citedScheb, J. M. & Scheb, J. M. (2011). Criminal law and procedure. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Mod 3 Pre-trial and trial procedures Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1605179-mod-3-pre-trial-and-trial-procedures
(Mod 3 Pre-Trial and Trial Procedures Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1605179-mod-3-pre-trial-and-trial-procedures.
“Mod 3 Pre-Trial and Trial Procedures Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1605179-mod-3-pre-trial-and-trial-procedures.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Mod 3 Pre-trial and trial procedures

What is a Double-Blind Study All about

The paper "What is a Double-Blind Study All about " discusses that the first advantage of conducting a double-blind randomized trial is that it eliminates the presence of bias in the research, especially those concerned with selection bias and confounding.... It is in the nature of a randomized double-blind trial which is also placebo-controlled that is medical in nature to have subjects that are given false treatment, also known as a placebo, and the researchers, as well as the subjects, are unable to distinguish between the two right up till the point when the study is concluded....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Cardiac Catheterization

TITLE: PREVENTION OF CONTRAST-INDUCED NEPHROPATHY DURING A CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION BY MARQUETTA HARDIMAN-RAVENELL OGMT-330 Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy during Cardiac Catheterization Cardiac catheterization is one of the most commonly performed medical procedures for evaluation and management of various cardiac ailments in a cardiology setting.... Cardiac catheterization is one of the important and frequently performed medical procedures that is performed by interventional cardiologists to not only diagnose some heart-related conditions, but also treat them....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Court System in England

Here the right of the defendant is upheld by making the defendant to ask for either a Crown trial or a Magistrate trial and the choice belongs not to the court, but to the defendant.... In case if the offence is of a more serious kind, magistrate himself might commit the defendant to a trial by the jury and under those circumstances, defendant's rights are not considered.... Summary offences are all creatures of statute, and the particular statute lays down the mode of trial and the appropriate penalty," Arguile (1969, p....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The Nature of the Illegal Trial of Jesus

The experts regard that the entire trial process to be totally unjust and a mere eyewash.... According to many of the research scholars, it was preplanned that Jesus would be killed more because of political reasons rather than religious causes but the rulers of the region could do so without a trial as because the general public was hostile towards those in powers as they have killed John the Baptist without any major charge.... ence, the entire set of drama regarding the trial of Jesus was organized and it had a whole lot of unethical processes and happenings....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Observation of Central Courthouse in San Diego

He told me that he had no problem with it and that there would be a pre-trial today.... In this paper I am going to state the hearing I observed and the charges against the defendant; and I will report briefly what happened in the courtroom and state the most… I will then later discuss how and why I found the happening of the court room to be relatively hard to understand, and explain how and why I believe that defendants, witnesses, victim of crime, or a jury member could find the court process daunting I also provide a critical reflection upon my experience in court outlining the relevant concepts discussed in Courts and Criminal Law....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Jury System in England and Wales

The assignment "Jury System in England and Wales " points out that The jury trial paradigm is an entrenched part of the criminal justice system, posited as a fundamental tool against oppression.... Indeed, Lord Devlin famously asserted that trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice.... nbsp;… The paper shows that Lord Denning's remarks in the case of Ward v James highlighted the overall judicial reluctance to the removal of trial by jury “let it not be supposed that this court is in any way opposed to trial by jury....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Why the Jury Is an Outmoded Institution and Ought to Be Discarded

hellip; In general, Devlin argued that trial by jury “gives protection against laws which the ordinary man may regard as harsh and oppressive” and is “insurance that the criminal law will conform to the ordinary man's idea of what is fair and just.... The central argument for the jury system in the English criminal justice system has been the preservation of justice and the prevention of a prejudiced trial and F.... Hails suggests that any “restriction on the right to trial by jury even for a single class of criminal is the first step on the ladder to the police state4....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Inside Clinical Trials: The Morale Side of Medical Experimentations

In fact, not only did the respective physicians failed to obtain the consent of the subject, but they always fraudulently described such experiential procedures as either particular condition's treatment of a diagnostic procedure, when he actually had no specific reason claim that the given patient would gain from the outcome of the experiment....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us