StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Is Sartre's Existentialist account of morality more preferable than that based on the existence of God - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The concept of morality is complex and difficult from many angles. The questions seem to be rhetorical, and over time philosophers and theologians alike have grappled with the purpose, origins and even the very definition of morality.

Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Is Sartres Existentialist account of morality more preferable than that based on the existence of God
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Is Sartre's Existentialist account of morality more preferable than that based on the existence of God"

Is Sartre's Existentialist account of morality more preferable than that based on the existence of God Introduction The concept of morality is complex and difficult from many angles. The questions seem to be rhetorical, and over time philosophers and theologians alike have grappled with the purpose, origins and even the very definition of morality. According to the Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary (1984), morality is defined as 'The quality of being virtuous.' The definition of virtue in the same dictionary is 'Moral excellence.' In order to grasp the core arguments of morality and virtue, we must first understand why they are so difficult to define for all of humanity, since so many different philosophies and religions exist today. Here we address the similar but different existential philosophies that address morality based on the existence of God or not. On the one hand, if God does not exist, then where is the value in morality If God does exist yet humans have free will, then what is the origin of morality Due to the evidence of every culture in antiquity believing in some sort of divinity as well as an afterlife, it is critical that we examine the need of such things. This essay will explore different views of existential philosophers in support of or repudiation to Sartre's existential account of morality. We must also bear in mind the political/theological atmosphere surrounding all of these thinkers, which propelled them to pen their thoughts for consideration by the intellectual community. The Pros and Cons Of Theories Of Morality Which Include God Herein lies the division between philosophy and theology; many times it seems that there is no division, simply an attempt to apply reason to religion, as it were. The very basis of philosophy is the search for Truth, and philosophers in general agree that no one owns Truth. The origins of philosophy were based around the conduct of humanity, based upon logic, ethics and emotion, with or without a God. While the philosophers of antiquity such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle addressed these three key components of philosophy whilst having been related to each other in terms of being each other's students, they managed to accommodate their contemporary theology in their views and ideas. In addition, the same disdain of politicians existed in their works, just as modern times. As philosophy progressed, politics of the day encroached more and more, taking on a more insistent voice in the musings of the philosophers. From Marxism to Existentialism in its truest sense, ideals of conduct were set forth with a plethora of reasons to engage in such conduct. In contrast to Sartre's assertions of morality having no intrinsic value other than humans being the sum of their parts, we look to the work of Karl Jasper, who cuts through the unnecessary conflict of whether or not there is a God and addresses the issue of transcendence being a process of individual maturation, which may lead to the discovery of the One in the Many. Jaspers was considered to be an anti-fascist; his premise took self-realisation into account with existentialism. The freedom of this style is that it gives the mind something to work toward in this one corporeal life; the betterment of oneself and therefore the discovery of interdependence, which may or may not lead to an epiphany regarding a supreme being. That Jaspers indicates something transcendent is indicative of the possibility of a God or higher being, or even a finer level of consciousness that is able to hold its morals and ethics in the face of life's daily pressures and trends, emerging triumphant from the blindness of the masses. While not advocating the existence of God, Jasper's work encourages morality without the need to negate God completely. In Jasper's own words, 'The philosopher lives, as it were, in a hidden, non-objective community to which every philosophising person secretly longs to be admitted. Philosophy has no institutional reality and is not in competition with the church, the state, the real communities of the world. Any objectification, whether it be the formation of schools or sects, is the ruin of philosophy' (Karl Jaspers, 1941, 'On My Philosophy,' excerpted from Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre, ed. Walter Kaufman, found online at: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/jaspers.htm). Works such as Jaspers' indicates a healthy perspective regarding philosophy and its relationship to theology. To him one should enhance the other, not destroy it or glorify it. This is balanced thinking. On the other hand we have the view of a culturally predetermined mind-set of secular thinking when expounding upon existentialism, automatically making such philosophy biased, as Nietzsche so eloquently phrased his argument: 'Inasmuch as at all times, as long as there have been human beings, there have also been herds of men (clans, communities, tribes, peoples, states, churches) and always a great many people who obeyed, compared with the small number of those commanding-considering, then, that nothing has been exercised and cultivated better and longer among men so far than obedience-it may fairly be assumed that the need for it is now innate in the average man, as a kind of formal conscience that commands: "thou shalt unconditionally do something, unconditionally not do something else," in short, "thou shalt." This need seeks to satisfy itself and to fill its form with some content' (Friedrich Nietzche, 1886, Beyond Good & Evil, p. 199). From this statement alone it is easy to recognize the danger of attempting philosophical thinking in its altruistic form when immersed in a society that is 'herd-bound' to a religion. Such premises will not have appeal to agnostic thinkers, atheists, or even members of organized religion who seek a different perspective. The lack of balance implicit in morality theories that include God from within a secular perspective can be locked into a limited mind-set, which does not allow for truly independent thinking and the ability to expand beyond that of the concept of God as put forth by mankind. The Pros and Cons Of Sartre's Theory Of Morality Excluding God The positive aspect of Sartre and his proponents is the factor of personal accountability. By thinking independently of a God with rules and human values and mores, one can form one's own concept of responsibility within the framework of culture and community. To realize one's own potential sans giving credit to or drawing power from a supreme being indicates the ultimate freedom. Unfortunately, the mainstream mind is afraid of this type of freedom, which is why Sartre and his contemporaries suffered much protest and criticism in a time period when communism was gaining ground and the religious and political circles were widening their grasps in the world. This style of philosophy suggests that man gives everything meaning, including himself. The human mind is capable of great imagination and creativity, and in possessing such qualities it is capable of fooling itself into believing in something else being in control. To be free of the constraints of dogma of any kind is the ultimate freedom, yet what does one do with that freedom Does it create a sense of well-being or anarchy Based upon recent history, the answer would be: both. It is imperative, then, that the individual handle freedom responsibly; God or no God, there are still the consequences of actions and choices. In this, the technological age, where religious and political strive are accelerating to dangerous proportions due to sophisticated weaponry and the rise of extremism, it is critical that we question morality in terms of cooperation rather than antagonism. Bertrand Russell gives a very good argument in terms of morality that excludes God: 'As I said before, I do not think that the real reason why people accept religion has anything to do with argumentation. They accept religion on emotional grounds. One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because religion makes men virtuous. So I am told; I have not noticed it' (Bertrand Russell, 1927, Why I Am Not a Christian: An Examination of the God-Idea and Christianity, p.20). The persuasion is that morality based upon religion is emotional rather than rational and a function of true intelligence. This argument is valid in that a truly intelligent person is fully capable of effective morals through the desire of true caring rather than devotion to God or abiding by the rules of the Ten Commandments. On the contrary, the writings of Kant illustrate the temptation to grossly misinterpret existentialism (which would, of course, be triggered by the emotions): 'We cannot think an object save through categories; we cannot know an object so thought save through intuitions corresponding to these concepts. Now all our intuitions are sensible; and this knowledge, in so far as its object is given, is empirical. But empirical knowledge is experience. Consequently, there can be no a priori knowledge, except of objects of possible experience' (Immanuel Kant, 1787, Critique of Pure Reason, Section 2, chapter 27, online etext). Here, Kant delineates the importance of thought (which is unlimited) as compared to knowledge (which is limited). The temptation here would be to react without fully comprehending the essence of existentialism; that the individual contains the meaning of what it thinks, what it deduces, what it observes, remembers and acquires as knowledge. Conclusion Which of the moralists have the most morality Hopefully the preceding arguments will make it difficult to answer that question. On the one hand, either secular or existential groups can adhere to a code of conduct and ethics; Violent and emotional reactions are capabilities of any animal including humans, when threatened (and whether the threat is real or imagined). In our modern era we have seen the casualties of extremist groups whose thinking has been rooted in any of the modalities presented here. Mostly the casualties are emotional as clashing ideologies and philosophies create a storm of debate capable of breaking down into violence. It cannot truly be said that either group or their branches are superior to the other. Yet when intertwined, they make for a powerful persuasion in intelligent living. Resources Himmelwright, Gayle (2003), 'Closet Existentialist: Paul-Michel Foucault's Unexplored Existentialist Leanings,' Gnosis, Vol. VI, No. 1, Concordia University Department of Philosophy |Online journal| available at: http://artsandscience.concordia.ca/philosophy/Gnosis/vol_vii_1/foucault.html [27 September 2005] Houghton Mifflin Company (1984), Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary, Berkley Books, New York. Jaspers, Karl (1941), 'On My Philosophy,' excerpted from Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre, ed. Walter Kaufman, Meridian Publishing Company, 1989, |Online|, available at: http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/jaspers.htm [26 September 2005] Kant, Immanuel (1787), 'Critique Of Pure Reason,' trans. Norman Kemp Smith, Section 2, Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding |Online|, available at: http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/kant/reason/ch02.htm#22 [27 September 2005] Nietzsche, Friedrich (1886), 'Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to the Philosophy Of the Future, trans. Walter Kaufmann, Vintage Books, New York, 1989. Maertens, Eppo (2004), 'Conflict, Recognition and the Development of Ethical Life in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit,' Ergon, University Of South Carolina College Of Arts And Sciences, Philosophy |Online journal|, available at: http://www.cas.sc.edu/phil/ergon/issue2/index.html [27 September 2005] Magrini, J.M. (2002), 'On the Sublime: Longinus, Burke and Kant,' The Carleton UniversityStudent Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 1 |Online journal| available at: http://rideau.carleton.ca/philosophy/cusjp/v20/n1/magrini.html [26 September 2005] Michels, Steven (2004, Sacred Heart University), 'Nietzsche and the Religion of the Future,' Animus, Vol. 9 |Online journal|, available at: http://www.swgc.mun.ca/animus/current/michels.htm [27 September 2005] McLemee, Scott (21 November, 1993), 'Sartre Redux: A new generation of scholars explores the philosophy and politics of the founder of existentialism,' Chronicle Of Higher Education |Online|, available at: http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i13/13a01001.htm [27 September 2005] Russell, Bertrand Arthur (1927), 'Why I Am Not a Christian: An Examination of the God-Idea and Christianity,' ed. E. Haldeman-Julius, The Little Blue Book, Haldeman-Julius Publications, Girard, Kansas, U.S.A., 1929. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Is Sartre's Existentialist account of morality more preferable than Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1509022-is-sartres-existentialist-account-of-morality-more-preferable-than-that-based-on-the-existence-of-god
(Is Sartre'S Existentialist Account of Morality More Preferable Than Essay)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1509022-is-sartres-existentialist-account-of-morality-more-preferable-than-that-based-on-the-existence-of-god.
“Is Sartre'S Existentialist Account of Morality More Preferable Than Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1509022-is-sartres-existentialist-account-of-morality-more-preferable-than-that-based-on-the-existence-of-god.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is Sartre's Existentialist account of morality more preferable than that based on the existence of God

Is Existentialism Nihilistic Why or Why Not

Existential nihilism is based on the belief that the world is meaningless and has no purpose in that all existence in it such as pain or feelings are senseless.... It is always linked with extreme skepticism and pessimism that condemns existence.... Existential nihilism has the convictions that the life has no meaning in this sense; it argues that the world has no purpose by stating that existence in itself such as suffering, feeling and all actions is ultimately empty and senseless....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Existentialism

Therefore, existentialism as noted by Jean Sartre on responsibility is based on the concepts such as the absurd, facticity, and authenticity among others.... Furthermore, there is also the aspect of the absurd that deals with deriving meaning from the structures of life especially in the maintenance of morality and ethics.... Additionally, there is also the voice of moral nihilists who affirm the absence of morality in the realms of existence....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Sartres Impact of Divine Absence in Existentialism

Rather than beginning with the disappearance of god, it proves more useful to work backwards from Sartre's world, from what exists "now", and then examine the implications a lack of divine presence means to humanity. Sartre divides his theory of existence into two basic categories, which he refers to as "en-soi" (in-itself) and "pour-soi" (for-itself), both of which are derived from his theory of consciousness.... Sartre observes that man is impassioned to be god, but that it is a futile endeavor....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Jean Paul Sartre

Sartre argued that neither science nor religions are capable of explaining the existence of human.... He has argued that his theories of authenticities can be used for explaining the existence of human.... The principles of Existentialism are based on the experiences of an individual.... In his opinion, external pressures force a person to live in a particular manner rather than god or anything else.... Existentialists such as Sartre believed that religions are misleading the people by educating the people that god is responsible for everything happening in this world....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Paper

Kierkegaard and Sartre's versions of existentialism

The main difference between the two versions is that Sartre, an atheist, fronts a rationale idea that the choices man make define their existence and their will shapes their image whilst Kierkegaard, a Christian, fronts a stronger idea that the existence of men is due to their religious beliefs and the in-depth understanding of God.... Faith is drawn from Christianity which is the belief in the existence of a supernatural being who has power and authority to watch over and control the choices and duties of men – a God....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Existentialism

What matters in the end is what one thinks about one self, values and acts based on his own consciousness about the meaning of their life.... One is where god made man in his own image and instilled human nature in him which therefore means that all human beings have an aspect of similarity and hence the issues of freedom and authenticity as described by existentialists is not fully possible in individuals.... There is also the other which is widely favored by the Christian existentialists where god and even more so Jesus Christ advocates for an individual knowing oneself first and loving oneself before transferring the same to others....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Existential Motifs in Medieval Poetry: Insights on Therapeutic Practice from Dante's Divine Comedy

Thus, in principle, the existentialists assert that the human beings ought to attach meaning and value to what is tangibly meaningful and sensible to them rather than believe in metaphysical orders and beings.... This paper will thus articulate and analyze the existentialist concept...
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Description of Existentialism and Human Existence as a Free Being

the existence of man comes first as compared to any other thing.... According to Sartre, the free individual existence of humanity on earth is self-created.... hellip; Sartre defines existentialism as a philosophy according to which, there is no God and a person is free in this world due to which, his existence is based on freedom and he has a dependence on his own self and no one else.... According to Sartre, people should be able to take the responsibilities of their actions and should not put it on god because there is no god who takes the responsibilities of someone's doing....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us