StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Major Issues in Criminal Scenarios - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Major Issues in Criminal Scenarios" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues in criminal scenarios. Clark’s liability for the criminal homicide of Andrew and Blake can be determined from the fact that he did not intend to kill the two although his action led to their death…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.1% of users find it useful
Major Issues in Criminal Scenarios
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Major Issues in Criminal Scenarios"

Criminal Scenario: Part Clark’s Liability Clark’s liability for the criminal homicide of Andrew and Blake can be determined from the fact that he did not intend to kill the two although his action led to their death. Mens rea is the legal term that is used to describe criminal intent or attitude in the commission of a crime (Samaha 124). Mens rea refers to the intention of the person behind committing the crime. A person can only be held to be liable for committing a crime if there is an explicitly stated or inferred criminal intent to commit the crime. Mens rea is an essential element of homicide and has to be present for liability to be determined. In the present case, Clark’s intention was to hunt deer and he mistook Andrew and Blake for a pair of deer due to his lack of experience as a hunter. This is despite the fact that Andrew and Blake had taken all reasonable precautions to avoid being mistaken for animals by wearing orange jackets. However, his action, or actus reus, led to the death of both brothers. Apart from that, there were no preliminary inchoate crimes that can lead one to believe that Clark intended to shoot and kill Andrew and Blake. There is no scope for Clark to claim a justification defence that could prove that while he committed the crime of homicide it was justified under the circumstances. Clark can be held liable under the felony murder rule. According to this rule, a death that is caused unintentionally during the course of committing a felony is a first-degree murder. If the felony murder rule is applied to the situation of Clark, it needs to be determined whether Clark was committing a felony at the time when he shot Andrew and Blake. From the information given in the case, it is apparent that Clark was committing a felony because he was hunting with a shotgun that he possessed illegally. He had been convicted of burglary two years ago and his possession of the shotgun amounted to unlawful possession of a firearm after a felony conviction. If the criminal conduct has been proved under the felony murder rule, Clark could plead an excuse under the right-wrong test which could show that at the time of the shooting, Clark was not did not know that he was going to shoot people and not deer. He would have some difficulty in proving this since he could see their orange jackets and could hear their laughter. He can also claim that he was not willing to shoot or kill the brothers. Dean’s Liability According to the case, Andrew had been shot by Clark in the back and was seen by Dean lying face down and breathing. This shows that Dean could have known that Andrew had been shot and was still alive. However, instead of helping to save his life, Dean chose not to get involved in the case and left the spot. The medical reports showed that Dean could have saved Andrew’s life by calling for medical help as soon as he had seen Andrew in the injured state. These case facts show that Dean was not actively involved in the killing of Andrew. However, he can be charged with actus reus on the ground of omitting to fulfil a duty owed to Andrew as a fellow citizen. Samaha explains that a according to the principle of omission as criminal act (p. 106), a person can be determined to be liable for an act if his conduct involves the omission to perform an act that he is capable of performing physically. According to the facts of the case, Dean failed to call an ambulance or help to move Andrew to a safer place. As a result of this omission, Andrew could not survive the wound and died. Since there is medical evidence for the fact that Andrew’s death was caused by Dean’s omission to act reasonably, the court could determine the liability of Dean for criminal homicide on the basis of the omission principle. The court could even hold Dean liable for involuntary manslaughter of Andrew since the actus reus is present as inferred from the omission principle while the mens rea of unintentional killing are both present (Samaha 298). It could be argued that Dean did not intend for Andrew to die; however, this could be challenged by the prosecution by arguing that Dean’s desire to not get involved in the case indicates that he believed that Andrew could lose his life if he was left there in that condition. Blake’s Liability The case explains that Blake was aware of the danger to his life after the incident. He may also have known that his brother Andrew had been shot and was alive due to the fact that he was still breathing. Blake might be able to escape liability for the murder of Andrew if it can be proven that had he made the effort to help Andrew get to a safe place and accompany him out of the woods, it would have put his own life in greater danger. Blake did not have a criminal intent in causing the death of either his brother Andrew or of the girls he killed unintentionally after passing out in the car. The law of omission does not require a person to put his own life at risk to save another person from harm (Samaha 235). On this basis, Blake would not be likely to be held liable for the omission. Blake also caused the death of Emily and Faith while they were coming out of a rock concert. He passed out while attempting to drive himself to a hospital in order to save his life. While Blake was aware that he might pass out while driving, he could be held liable on grounds of the felony murder rule. The act of stealing the car from the driveway of a nearby house would amount to felony. Although Blake did not intend to cause the death of Emily and Faith, their unintentional killing while driving a stolen car would amount to an act of murder while committing felony. However, Blake can invoke the defense of necessity (Samaha 183) by stating that but he stole the car in order to save his life and by proving that he had no other reasonable alternative to stealing the car. While it is likely that Blake would be charged under the felony murder rule for the murders of Emily and Faith and the omission principle for contributing to the killing of Andrew, the Court may decide to employ the principle of diminished responsibility in view of the defence of necessity. Criminal Scenario: Part 2 Andy lived in the impoverished neighborhood of Downville where crime gangs were active and held a lot of influence. Rival gangs competed for a bigger share in various illegal activities including car theft and drug peddling. People like Andy who could not afford to move to a better neighborhood simply kept out of the gangs’ way as far as possible. Violence in Downville was so high that even the police would avoid patrolling the area at night. After graduating from high school, Andy decided to move to the state of Hopeton in search of a good job and a respectable life. A day before Andy was about to leave for Hopeton, a member of one of the gangs named Tony came to his house. Tony handed him a packet of marijuana asking him to take it with him to Hopeton where a friend of Tony’s named Charlie would take it from him. Marijuana was illegal in Hopeton despite a strong demand for it among the elite classes. Consequently, the police were alert on it being smuggled from neighboring states. Andy knew this and told Tony that he would not risk committing a crime. Tony became aggressive upon Andy’s refusal and stuffed the packet into Andy’s suitcase that was lying open on a table nearby. He then threatened Andy by reminding him that his family would continue to live in Downville even if he did not. He also said that Andy should be concerned about their safety and wellbeing more than anything else. He further said that if the marijuana did not reach Charlie it would result in an unpleasant situation for his family. Andy had witnessed Tony and his gang members frequently harass and intimidate residents in Downville in order to extort money from them and get them to do their bidding. The residents avoided reporting these incidents to the police for fear of reprisal. Andy was aware of the consequences of not complying with Tony’s instructions and took his words as a credible threat to the safety of his family in his absence. He finally consented to take the packet of marijuana with him in his suitcase to Hopeton the next morning. The next morning, Andy was stopped at a check post outside the limits of Hopeton and a policeman asked to check his luggage. The packet of marijuana was eventually discovered and Andy was arrested for attempting to smuggle banned narcotics into Hopeton. A few weeks later, Andy was presented before the judge at the Hopeton circuit court for a trial. At the trial, evidence was presented to show that the marijuana had been retrieved from inside Andy’s suitcase and that Andy had admitted to have been carrying it knowingly into Hopeton. He also stated that he knew about the laws that banned marijuana from being grown in Hopeton or to be brought into it from outside. However, according to the forensics reports, Andy’s fingerprints had not been found on the packet of marijuana. It had also been proven that Andy had indeed been caught while attempting to smuggle marijuana into the state. Once the criminal liability was established, Andy’s lawyer presented a defence of duress. He explained that Andy had only agreed to carry the marijuana to protect his family against retaliation from Tony and his gang members. He pleaded that the court should admit this defense as valid. What defense is Andy presenting and is it a valid defense? Answer: Andy’s lawyer is presenting a defense of duress to the court. The defense of duress is one of the defenses that can be made after the criminal liability has been established and the defendant faces the burden of proving a defense. Basically, in a defense for duress, the defendant claims that he was forced to commit the criminal act by another person. Samaha explains that proving the validity of a defense of duress is challenging because scholars and judges hold differing opinions about whether such a defense should be admissible (216). In order for Andy’s defense of duress to be valid, his lawyer will need to prove the existence of four elements of the defense of duress. First, he needs to determine the nature of the threat (Samaha 216). It should involve serious bodily injury to qualify as a valid threat. Andy should prove that Tony’s threat was intended as a threat to bodily harm to Andy’s family members. He should also specify whether he believed it to be a threat to life, serious bodily injury, or a less serious kind of harm. Second, the harm should be immediate (Samaha 216). The lawyer should prove that Tony threatened Andy of consequences for his family if the marijuana was not delivered to Charlie the very next day. Third, it should be determined whether the defense of duress is applicable to marijuana smuggling in Hopeton. Finally, it is important for the defendant to believe the threat to be real and genuine (Samaha 216). In this case, Andy should prove that he had witnessed Tony’s gang rough up and assault residents and he had reason to believe his family members could be assaulted in a similar way. It appears that Andy’s defense of duress is valid since the threat of retaliation from the gang was credible and it was necessary for Andy to carry the marijuana in order to prevent harm to his family. Bibliography Samaha, Joel. Criminal Law, 11th ed. Cengage Learning. 2013. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Criminal Scenarios Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Criminal Scenarios Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1701327-criminal-scenarios
(Criminal Scenarios Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Criminal Scenarios Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1701327-criminal-scenarios.
“Criminal Scenarios Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1701327-criminal-scenarios.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Major Issues in Criminal Scenarios

Critical Incident Management

If the agencies are already aware of what measures they can take at a particular situation, they would not take much time in responding if the situation actually takes place; not only in criminal agencies but also in many other kind of organizations, such as hospitals, multinational corporations, banks and other companies.... he law enforcement and other agencies should preserve the knowledge regarding the scenarios in their facets so that the newly assigned officers can get help from them....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Scenario: A Silent Child

Evidently, Tina assumes that her mentor and course tutor must have encountered such scenarios.... Evidently, Tina assumes that her mentor and course tutor must have encountered such scenarios.... Moreover, Tina discovers that other Dip students and tutors are less concerned with such issues.... In particular, the mentor concludes that the pupil does not have a major problem....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The strategic plan for my future vision

Since personal assessment begins with vision (Brott, 2009), therefore this report assesses my current stage in life and uses various information to develop scenarios for the subsequently stages of my life.... The financial assessment reveals that there has been a decline in my financial condition to date....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Criminal Theories of Crime

Discuss what those causes are for Anomie, Control, conflict, and Differential Association theories.... What are the similarities and differences between them?... Which of the approaches do you.... ... ... What is it about that approach that strikes you as useful in explaining crime or delinquency? ...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Major Scenarios in Law

The essay "Major scenarios in Law" focuses on the critical analysis of the major scenarios in law.... The following two scenarios provide the application of the theories of crime.... Criminology theories are theories that try to explain the existence of a certain crime in society....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Major Scenarios in Criminology Cases

The essay "Major scenarios in Criminology Cases" focuses on the critical analysis of the two major scenarios in criminology cases.... The following two scenarios provide the application of the theories of crime.... Criminology theories are theories that try to explain the existence of a certain crime in society....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Sam Slime: A Reflective Analysis of the Scenarios

"Sam Slime: A Reflective Analysis of the scenarios" paper analyzes this case and states that stealing through the political process is morally more reprehensible than stealing done individually and regular political expropriation of another individual's income is exactly similar to slavery.... An understanding of the two scenarios on the basis of the effects of corruption helps one in determining the more serious act of stealing.... The commonality between these two scenarios is that the same person is the real sufferer in the stealing by the individual as well as the political process, and the breakdown of this commonality is in the fact that the individual is acknowledged as the victim in Scene 1 whereas the same person turns out to be the criminal in Scene 2 where stealing is actually done by the political process....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

The Problem with Ethics in the Criminal Justice System

The notion of ethical issues in criminal justice is associated with the conception of what is linked with the understanding of moral philosophy, perceptions of crediting something as right or regarding something as wrong, and outlining the moral qualities which must be possessed and practiced by an individual to achieve a sound state of ethical and moral standing (Banks, 2012).... he integration of ethics and subsequent ethical dilemmas in criminal justice is rooted in establishing the link between these comprehensive notions....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us