StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Landmark Case of Conjoined Twins - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "The Landmark Case of Conjoined Twins" describes that judges often make such moral reasoning, but if we were to allow them to state these reasons clearly, we could ensure a more fair and just method of legal debate rather than hide such reasoning behind legal terms…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
The Landmark Case of Conjoined Twins
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Landmark Case of Conjoined Twins"

The landmark case of Re A (Conjoined Twins concerns the court’s decision on whether it would be lawful to separate conjoined twins knowing that to do so would inevitably kill one of the twins, whereas inaction would result in both of their eventual deaths. It was considered that the potential charge could be murder, as the surgeons knew that the procedure would kill one of the twins. This is certainly an example of a ‘hard case’. When no specific law exists to tell us either way, where are we to resort to in order to find an answer? In such a sensitive case, can the law provide for an answer in every circumstance? As a natural lawyer, one believes that there is a concept of law beyond that of the written provisions, and therefore an objective knowledge of right and wrong. Where authority does not provide for a specific case, judges can be trusted to have recourse to natural law principles in order to decide such a case. Indeed, in the present case, it appears that the judges were more intent on trying to justify their decision based on the posited laws in question rather than explore the actual problem. This need to base a decision on a specific rule in order to prove it valid in such a difficult case should not be the main focus of the decision. Rather, the judges should have openly referred to moral considerations as separate from the posited law which could not provide the relevant provisions anyhow. The posited law concerning this case is simple – it is unlawful to murder a human being. This simplicity could not possibly have provided the legal counsel to such a difficult and unique case. Therefore, a moral consideration should have been able to play a role in the decision, for the judge’s reflective intellect is able to decide as to what justice requires. Interestingly, the court made it clear that moral considerations were beyond their abilities, and that to choose between two equally plausible possibilities (there were as many moral reasons to separate the twins as there were to not separate them) would indeed separate law from morality. The natural lawyer would find this rather ironic, as human law derives its legal validity from natural law, and therefore, there always has been or always is a connection between law and morality.2 This judgement of the judges in itself was a somewhat moral assessment, albeit a decision to not openly recourse to moralistic concepts. It appears though that the decision was hugely based on moral considerations, which were then hidden behind the posited law principles. This strongly supports the notion that moral law and human law cannot be separated; it is the validity of this human law as law which is granted it by the moral law it is based upon. And so, one would suggest that the judges progress past the actual posited law in its simplicity, and delve into the moral aspects and the specific, more complicated moral implications with which it was intended to apply. So how would a natural lawyer approach the case in question? What aspects would be considered in order to arrive at the decision? If there exist natural rights which cannot be entrenched upon by positive law, 3 then the assessment of such rights would not move away from the positive law in question, but rather the judge would be able to openly reason morally, rather than conceal such reasoning behind the posited law. One could argue that one judge’s moral reasoning could prove very different from that of another, depending on his personal outlook.4 But, it is also strongly arguable that a universal set of morals does underlie the law,5 and that when the latter does not provide enough guidance, then the judge must consider the moral reasoning behind the law in question to arrive at a more suited decision based on the posited law, but not necessarily confined to it. Aristotle6 states that natural justice is not affected by individual’s opinions or interpretations of it, so we may enter into a moral assessment as to whether it would be just to separate the twins or not. To separate the twins is a form of murder indeed, and would result in the death of one, albeit inevitable from the outset. But to keep the twins intact ensures both of their deaths, when one could have a good chance at life if the procedure were to go ahead. Is this not then a form of murder, but of two lives, if the procedure were to not be performed? Why the need to hide behind terms of ‘necessity’ and ‘omission’ to come to the same conclusion? If the judges were able to openly assess the moral aspects of the situation, then perhaps everybody would have understood on a much deeper basis just how the decision was reasoned. Justinian7 exclaims that the natural law is never changing whereas positive law constantly develops, therefore a judge, when he refers to moral considerations is referring to the ultimate precedent provided for by natural law; he does not do what he thinks is right or wrong. He decides what we all consider to be right, as we each have recourse to our moral codes, which lie way beyond that of the posited law. It could be argued that the decision to undertake the separation is a form of utilitarianism - the least harm caused. Yet even this decision, or this way of seeing the situation could be a part of one’s natural inclination to do good. This utilitarian method of thought could be said to be based on the natural inclination to cause the least harm to all involved – arguably a natural law principle. The mere inclination to do good may be enough to make the correct moral decision; need we be confined to the restrictive concepts of posited law, which in this case could not provide guidance from the outset? Indeed, if a posited law is clear and concise and applies unquestionably to a situation, the one has not the need to consider moral judgements. However, in such difficult cases, the posited law is simply not enough, and the judge must ‘stretch’ its meaning and application to the situation at hand, which requires nothing less than moral reasoning on the part of us all. In conclusion, in such difficult cases, the positivist should allow judges to move away from the confines of the posited law if necessary, for some decisions simply must be based on more moralistic reasoning than posited law. It is clear that judges often make such moral reasoning, but if we were to allow them to state these reasons clearly, we could ensure a more fair and just method of legal debate rather than hide such reasoning behind legal terms and posited law which was obviously not applicable to a large degree in the first place. Bibliography Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae: Part 2, question 94, article 2 Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics [350 BC] Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights [1980] Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract [1762] Justinian. Institutes [535 CE] McLeod, Ian. Legal Theory, 2nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan (2003) Michalowski, Sabine. "Reversal of Fortune "Re A (Conjoined Twins)" and Beyond: Who Should Make Treatment Decisions on Behalf of Young Children?" Health Law Journal Vol.9. 149 (2001) Wendel, W. Bradley. Jurisprudence and Judicial Ethics, IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law, Poland. (2007) Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Landmark Case of Conjoined Twins

Medical Law for Euthanasia

For instance, in the conjoined twins case, the court ordered the separation of the conjoined twins, thereby causing the death of one of them.... In addition, the plea of the parents that such separation should not be effected, as it would result in the death of one of the twins, was ignored by the court (Re A (Children) (conjoined twins: Surgical Separation) , 2000).... Re A (Children) (conjoined twins: Surgical Separation) , EWCA Civ 254 (England and Wales Court of Appeal 2000)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Schizophrenia and Bipolar in Psychiatric Researches

More over, it has also been observed that schizophrenic disorder occurs at increased rates in the families with case of schizophrenic and bipolar disorder and both these disorders occur at increased rate in family containing schizoaffective disorder (Craddock, O'Donovan, & Owen, 2006).... Similarly in the case of schizophrenia, an imbalance in the allelic expression of RELN was noticed (Ovadia & Shifman, 2011).... Schizophrenia and Manic-depressive Disorder: The Biological Roots of Mental Illness as Revealed by the landmark Study of Identical Twins....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

PersuasiveControvserial paper

Moderates believes that abortion should be a last resort and justified in case the pregnant woman cannot raise the child or give it up for adoption, or "if the pregnancy risks pose a danger for the life and health of the woman" (Hull et al 98).... Every specific case should be discussed separately in accordance with the circumstances and patients' health conditions.... Norma McCorvey had already given birth by the time the case was brought before the Court in December 1971....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Discussion of the Historical and Judicial Tussle between Law and Morality

The statement in the question above comes from the very controversial case of Re A 3 (Children) (conjoined twins: Surgical Separation) where the parents of six-week-old Siamese twins, Mary and Jody,(M and J) appealed against a court order granting the NHS the authority to perform an optional surgical separation.... It was held at first instance that the operation would serve the interests of both the twins by offering J a chance of normal life and giving M the opportunity to avoid the last few painful months of her life....
23 Pages (5750 words) Essay

Legislation for Healthcare

In the landmark case of R v.... n the so called twins case, The Court of Appeal in England confirmed a lower courts ruling that doctors could perform an operation to separate recently born conjoined twins.... In a number of analogous cases the world over, surgical teams had refused to operate because they could not morally accept the killing of one of the conjoined twins for the benefit of another.... Coughlan is a landmark case, because, first, the concept of a substantive legitimate expectation was created; that is, if a public body makes a promise it must keep it....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Developments in the Human Fertilization and Embryology

The courts have often responded rhetorically that “this is a court of law not a court of morals” as in the case of Re A 3 (Children) (conjoined twins: Surgical Separation) where the parents of six week old Siamese twins, Mary and Jody,(M and J) appealed against a court order granting the NHS the authority to perform an optional surgical separation .... onsider the case of Queen v Dudley and Stephens5 where three sailors of a shipwrecked crew decided to murder and eat the Cabin boy, after starving for a month and pleaded in their defence that they had no other course open to them....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Modern Development of the Law and Practice Concerning Stop and Search In Relation To Its Impact on Human Rights and Civil Liberties

Otherwise there will be more actions and judgments against the act as in the case of the decision handed down by the European Court of Human Rights.... The case that was brought forward by these two against their detention by the police, which they hold to have been unlawful and unwarranted, has been ground breaking in the fight that bodies have been having against the United Kingdom police and legislators.... iberty Wins Landmark Stop and Search case in Courts of Human Rights 2010, Liberty, viewed 13 November, 2010 < http://www....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

e A (conjoined twins) [2000] 4 All ER 961, [2001] 1 FLR 1 CA ... It was a landmark case, and provided a great basis for the potential successful application of the UD.... This was the case in Filartiga v Pena Irala, in which the UD was referred to by the United States to punish an alien on the basis of article 5 – the right to protection from torture.... Indeed, a rather ironic look at the recent problems regarding detainee torture suffered at the hands of US soldiers somewhat undermines it upholding of the protection from torture in the Filartiga case....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us