StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Appointment - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Judiciary Selection and Appointment Current reports in the political scenes in Washington had been quite controversial with the nomination of a highly endorsed law professor, Mr. Goodwin Liu, as part of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95% of users find it useful
In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Appointment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Appointment"

In Executive and Legislative ity: Judiciary Selection and Appointment Current reports in the political scenes in Washington had been quite controversial with the nomination of a highly endorsed law professor, Mr. Goodwin Liu, as part of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. His liberal views had caught the attention of the administration's office, and what is believed as needed in the said judiciary office. Unfortunately, such opinions are not shared by the overly political outlooks in the Senate, where the said nomination has to be submitted and scrutinized.

Further accounts exhibited the substantial opposition of several senators by way of a filibuster, as clashes in political ideologies between Republicans and Democrats in such proceedings seemed to dominate, and Mr. Liu had been caught in the middle (Savage). In the presence of a filibuster approach, a delaying tactic effectively blocks a bill or nomination either by prolonged debates or any procedure of similar mechanism (“Reform and the Filibuster”). In the involvement of the senate in such important appointment procedure, one may wonder on the exact basis for shared obligation of the President and Senate in performing additional functions on areas involving another State office, the Judiciary section.

The governing body that embodies the United State’s Constitution had been aptly divided into three essential offices: “legislative, executive (and) judiciary.” The separation of offices also generated separate powers to promote the principle of “check and balance,” but are still overlapping in the process (May and Ides 290-291). The State’s Constitution had been quite specific in dividing the responsibility in placing competent officers in judiciary positions. Relatively, the nomination authority belongs in the President’s prudent power, while the judges’ confirmation will be authorized in the Senate.

Balance is said to be attained in such procedure, but superiority would still come from type of standing that the Presidents possess within the Senate parties, and even in the dominating stance of the latter in White House (Posner 14). This being said, majority party would always get the dominant votes, and inherently, the power that goes with it. In the case of Mr. Liu, the dominating Republicans in White House had been a great hurdle for his appointment, and despite the substantial endorsement of the President’s office, his application would still depend on the Senate’s individual and collective decision.

In the case presented above, it seemed that political interests dominate the selection and appointment process, defeating the Constitutional purpose of objective accountability. Theoretically, three substantial bases should be employed during the appointment procedure, depending on the nominee’s competent suitability, the strength of political connections and reinforcements, and the political advantages of such nomination of senate and presidential electorate chances (Posner 14). Of the three, the last concept seemed to bear relevant weight on the large opposition for Mr.

Liu’s nomination, where his Democratic ideologies go against Republican ruling in the Senate. Whereby the President consulted the Senate’s legal assistance in confirming appeal judges with excellent merits, the latter appear to blunder their own constitutional obligations by looking after their own political benefit, instead of proceeding for the prudent interest of the State and the public they serve. All in all, the President is legally required to seek a balanced approval from the Senate in objectively choosing rightful appeal judges based on ideally excellent merits, and avoid vested interest to such an important obligation of both offices.

Up to this point, the Constitution had been idealistic in its impositions on how the two branches perform their nominative and appointive duties, but current realities demonstrated otherwise. Works Cited May, Christopher N., and Allan Ides. Constitutional Law National Power and Federalism: Examples and Explanations. United States of America: Aspen Publishers, 2007. Print. Posner, Richard A. The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform. United States of America: Harvard University Press, 1999. Print.

“Reform and the Filibuster.” The New York Times 3 January 2011: A20. Print. Savage, Charlie. “Appeals Court Nominee Ignites Partisa Battle.” The New York Times 13 April 2010: A15. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1425757-3-president-obama-recently-named-professor-goodwin-liu-of-the-university-of-california-at-berkeley-to-united-states-9th-c
(In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Essay)
https://studentshare.org/other/1425757-3-president-obama-recently-named-professor-goodwin-liu-of-the-university-of-california-at-berkeley-to-united-states-9th-c.
“In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/other/1425757-3-president-obama-recently-named-professor-goodwin-liu-of-the-university-of-california-at-berkeley-to-united-states-9th-c.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF In Executive and Legislative Authority: Judiciary Selection and Appointment

The Separation of Powers

For instance, the legislature, executive and judicial branches should have equal status so each could control the excessive use of power by another branch2[Constitutional and Administrative Law Pg 105].... In order to answer this question it is necessary to discuss about the executive, the legislature and the judiciary, the relationship between executive and legislature, legislature and judiciary; executive and judiciary.... he judiciary: The judiciary is that branch of the state which adjudicates upon conflicts between state institutions, between state and individual, and between individuals....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The United Kingdom Constitution

The functions of the executive and legislature are often mingled with that of the judiciary since ministers who implement new acts are also involved in legislation, similarly judges in the House of Lords are also entitled to participate in the legislative business of the Upper House.... There is no formal separation of powers between the three branches of government – the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary.... Dicey who stated that “in theory, Parliament has total power, it is sovereign” thereby it is the source of all valid authority....
7 Pages (1750 words) Report

Have Recent Reforms Increased Parliaments Ability to Hold the Executive to Account

Additionally, the judiciary obtains their power from the Crown and there is a distinct overlap of functions between the powers, which should be separated for the effective application of the separation of powers and the efficacy of Parliament as a check on the executive8.... o address these inefficiencies in the constitutional notion of a separation of powers, the Government undertook what was propounded as the “biggest constitutional shake-up for years9” asserted determination “to put the relationship between Executive, Legislature and judiciary on a modern footing, respecting the separation of powers between the three10....
9 Pages (2250 words) Article

Theoretical for Justification for the Separation of Powers in the British Constitution

The Lord Chancellor's role was multifarious, ranging from the minister, Law Lord, head of the judiciary, and a member of the House of Lords in its legislative capacity.... As such, the doctrine of ultra vires is theoretically vital in serving as a testament to the independence of the judiciary in its role under the fundamental constitutional separation of powers in ensuring that public bodies, such as government departments, local authorities, tribunals, agencies have not acted ultra vires5....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Operation of the Doctrine of the Separation of Powers

Additionally, the judiciary obtain their power from the Crown and there is a distinct overlap of functions between the powers, which should be separated for the effective application of the separation of powers8.... For example, the executive clearly carries out legislative functions and a prime example is the Law Commission.... Parliament is essentially the legislative section of the British political system.... Nevertheless, it has been commented that the doctrine does in fact influence everyday operations of the executive, legislature and judiciary4 and Barnett argues that “Separation of powers…… runs like a thread throughout the constitution of the United Kingdom5....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Case Marbury V. Madison

Thus, this historic case created the concept of Judicial Review or the capability of the judiciary declaring a law unconstitutional.... The court case hence resulted to the judiciary, Legislative & Executive branches of the government is on an evener power basis ultimately setting the precedent for an infinite number of future historic decisions (Marbury versus Madison, 1803).... n the last day in office, Adams the president commissioned sixteen new justices for the circuit court and forty-two peace justices for the Columbia district in his last day in office under the Organic Act, which was meant taking control of the judiciary of the Federal government by the Federalists before Thomas Jefferson took office....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Is the Howard Government Remaking the Court in Its Own Image

The independence of the judiciary6 from the executive and legislative branches of Government is an established principle in many countries, as embodied through the United Nations.... "Is the Howard Government Remaking the Court in Its Own Image" paper argues that there can be no doubt that the Howard Government has exercised a considerable influence upon the recent decisions of the High Court – not by direct manipulation, but through the appointment of the of candidates....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

The Separation of Powers in The UK

Additionally, the judiciary obtains their power from the Crown and there is a distinct overlap of functions between the powers, which should be under the separation of powers doctrine5.... These provisions have far-reaching constitutional implications and impact the relationship between the Executive, Legislative and the judiciary powers in the United Kingdom where the demarcation of the separation of power has traditionally been blurred.... hellip; The theoretical for justification for the separation of powers centers on its fundamental importance to the operation of democracy and assumes that certain functions should be carried out by different institutions with neither impinging the other's authority....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us